Immune checkpoint system stands for the inhibitory receptors that
appear on our immune cells (and their ligands on normal tissue cells) that work
as "immunological brakes". In physiological condition, such mechanism
ensures that the functions of immune cells will get buffered and thus will not
impair normal cells surrounding them. The best-known inhibitory receptors are
Program Death-1 (PD-1) and Cytotoxic-T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4)
that are expressed on most immune cell types.
However, when it comes to cancer condition, immune checkpoints can
also be hijacked by cancer cells to protect themselves from immune
surveillance. Notably, some cancer cells highly express the ligands of these
inhibitory receptors. So imagine in optimal condition, a immune cell can
recognize a tumor cell, get activated and can eventually kill it. But when
cancer cells trigger the inhibitory pathways of immune cells by directly
binding to the PD-1 and CTLA-4 receptors on them, cancer cells can escape
immune surveillance.
One of the hottest anti-cancer treatments that both pharmaceutical
companies and research institutes are rigorously studying is immune checkpoint
blockage. Pembrolizumab is developed by Roche to block the
PD-1 pathways while Bristol-Myers Squibb also has its commercialized PD-1
inhibitor Nivolumab. These
drugs have shown encouraging results treating melanoma and non-small cell lung
cancer (NSCLC) and they are being clinically studied in treating other types of
cancers.
Though these immune checkpoint inhibitors are truly blowing our
mind in evolutionizing cancer treatment, they only work for a set of patients
while the others don't really respond.. Why is it so?
Several most recent studies have provided some hints of the myth.
A study from MSKCC compared a cohort of NSCLC patients that either gained
benefit from PD-1 inhibitor treatment or not. It found that when a patient
carries more mutations that render more neo-antigens, he/she tends to have a
better result from the immunotherapy(1Snyder,
Makarov et al. 2014). Another studied on melanoma patients
suggested that the pre-existing immune cells in tumor can serve as a good
indicate that PD-1 inhibitor would work for the patient(Tumeh,
Harview et al. 2014). So it appears that immune checkpoint can
only work to potentiate the pre-existed immune cells that are functionally
inhibited.
One latest study by a group from University of Chicago published their
result in Nature that suggested that activation of a specific pathway (here as
WNT/beta-catenin pathway) in melanoma tumor cells can inhibit the immune cell
infiltration to tumor sites. (Spranger,
Bao et al. 2015) In such case, melanoma patients with high
beta-catenin wouldn’t respond to PD-1 inhibiting treatment. The study provides
a very intriguing mechanism that tumor cells can inhibit the trafficking and
infiltration of immune cells. So if we can use combo therapy by targeting both
PD-1 and beta-catenin pathways, maybe we can treat the originally
non-responsive patients?!
Snyder, A., et al. (2014). "Genetic basis for clinical response to
CTLA-4 blockade in melanoma." N Engl J Med 371(23): 2189-2199.
Spranger, S., et
al. (2015). "Melanoma-intrinsic [bgr]-catenin signalling prevents
anti-tumour immunity." Nature advance
online publication.
Tumeh, P. C., et
al. (2014). "PD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune
resistance." Nature 515(7528):
568-571.
Comments
Post a Comment